Cases 1 - 10 of 81
HAWKINS v. DANAHER CORPORATION et al
as 1:2023cv02055
Plaintiff:
BRENDA HAWKINS
Defendant:
DANAHER CORPORATION, RAINER M. BLAIR and MATT MCGREW
STRIPLIN v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2023cv01739
Plaintiff:
AAREN STRIPLIN and AARON WILLIAMS STRIPLIN
Defendant:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., KAMALA HARRIS, ROBERT MUELLER and others
BLAIR v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2023cv01574
Plaintiff:
DAVID ALAN BLAIR
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, KEVIN PERALTA, CLAUDY TOUSSAINT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
SCHIFF v. BLAIR et al
as 1:2022cv03845
Defendant:
GRAHAM SCHIFF, RICHARD BLAIR, PAUL COLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ETIENNE v. SANDERS et al
as 1:2022cv02509
Defendant:
KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Plaintiff:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Tristan Florendo-Ong v. IL-USA, et al
as 22-5206
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tristan Florendo-Ong
Defendant / Appellee:
IL-USA, Illinois-United States & Company, 116th/117th US Congressional 535 Members, 535 Members Bicameral Legislature, 177 Members IL G.A., 177 Members Bicameral Legislature and others
FLORENDO-ONG v. IL-USA et al
as 1:2022cv01596
Plaintiff:
TRISTAN FLORENDO-ONG
Defendant:
116th/117th US CONGRESSIONAL 535 MEMBERS, 177 MEMBERS IL G.A., CECILIA ABUNDIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
BLAIR v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv03089
Plaintiff:
SAMANTHA BLAIR
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Yvette Beaulieu v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 21-5183
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Yvette B. Beaulieu
Defendant / Appellee:
Merrick B. Garland, Mark Gross, James R. Clapper, Jr. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
