Cases 1 - 10 of 709
ROGERS v. BLAIR et al
as 2:2024cv01534
Plaintiff:
BRUCE ROGERS
Defendant:
REBECCA BLAIR and LENNOX INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
BFF II PTE. LTD. et al v. ROSEN et al
as 2:2024cv01228
Plaintiff:
BFF II PTE. LTD. and SIDE DOOR VENTURES, LP
Defendant:
MATTHEW ROSEN and BLAIR JESSE REICH
BLAIR v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv01829
Plaintiff:
EMILY BLAIR
Defendant:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dropkin v. Blair et al
as 1:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Stuart Dropkin
Defendant:
Rainer M. Blair, Matt McGrew, Emmanuel Ligner and others
Blair v. Salamon et al
as 1:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
Dakil N. Blair
Defendant:
Bobby Jo Salamon, SCI-Rockview and Officer Carl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWANDOWSKI v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
as 1:2024cv00671
Plaintiff:
ANN LEWANDOWSKI
Defendant:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, THE PENSION & BENEFITS COMMITTEE OF JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, PETER FASOLO and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
LEWANDOWSKI v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv00671
Plaintiff:
ANN LEWANDOWSKI
Defendant:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, THE PENSION & BENEFITS COMMITTEE OF JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, PETER FASOLO and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
VAUGHN v. WEEKS et al
as 3:2024cv00016
Petitioner:
JASON W. VAUGHN
Respondent:
U.S. DISTRICT COURT, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BLAIR COUNTY and WARDEN ABBY TATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Blair Thomas, Jr.
as 24-1171
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BLAIR THOMAS, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
