Cases 41 - 50 of 267
Puerto v. Board of Prison Term
as 1:2013cv01097
Petitioner:
Jose Rodriguez Puerto
Respondent:
Board of Prison Term
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Board of Prison Terms
as 3:2013cv00949
Plaintiff:
Larry Lionel White
Defendant:
Board of Prison Terms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricardo Gaxiola v. Board of Prison Term, et al
as 13-55292
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICARDO MARTINEZ GAXIOLA
Respondent - Appellee:
BOARD OF PRISON TERM and J. TIM OCHOA, Warden
Steve Garrison v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 13-15189
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVE Y. GARRISON
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., ALAMEDA SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and STATE PAROLE BOARD OF PRISON TERMS, CDCR
Owens v. California Board of Prison Terms
as 2:2013cv00156
Petitioner:
Kimmie L. Owens
Respondent:
California Board of Prison Terms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jeremy Christopher Brandon v. Board of Prison Terms et al
as 2:2012cv10877
Respondent:
Board of Prison Terms, P D Brazelton and People of the State of California
Petitioner:
Jeremy Christopher Brandon
Fisher v. San Francisco County Jail et al
as 3:2012cv05616
Petitioner:
Rudolph S. Fisher
Respondent:
San Francisco County Jail and Board of Prison Term
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jack Cabada v. CDC State of California, et al.
as 2:2012cv09215
Defendant:
Board of Prison Terms, CDC State of California and Dr. Meyers
Plaintiff:
Jack Cabada
Hardaway v. Board of Prison Terms, et al
as 5:2012cv05372
Plaintiff:
Sonny Ray Hardaway
Defendant:
Board of Prison Terms and Jeffrey Champlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv05398
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.