Cases 1 - 10 of 10
KING v. BOWEN
as 1:2022cv00087
Petitioner:
TELVIN BOBBY KING
Respondent:
Warden TOMMY BOWEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
King v. Esochaghi et al
as 1:2021cv01269
Plaintiff:
Bobby King
Defendant:
Iheanyichukwu Esochaghi and Tatum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lakeith Amir-Sharif v. William Stephens, et al
as 16-40918
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAKEITH AMIR-SHARIF
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DELANA CHACHERE, BOBBY KING and others
Lakeith Amir-Sharif v. William Stephens, et al
as 16-40327
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAKEITH AMIR-SHARIF
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DELANA CHACHERE, BOBBY KING and others
Amir-Sharif v. Stephens et al
as 3:2016cv00044
Plaintiff:
Lakeith Amir-Sharif
Defendant:
William Stephens , Delana Chachere , Bobby King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Lienemann et al
as 3:2011cv00130
Plaintiff:
Bobby King
Defendant:
C/O Lienemann, Andy K Ott, Michael P Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Morgan v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 09-60959
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL GRAHAME MORGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, CHRISTOPHER EPPS and others
Clay v. Epps et al
as 3:2009cv00318
Plaintiff:
Louis J. Clay
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Moncree Allen, Mary R. Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. King, et al
as 08-60446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EARL LEWIS ANDERSON, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
RON KING, LARRY HARDY, D WEST, Captain and others
Morgan v. State of Mississippi et al
as 2:2007cv00015
Plaintiff:
Paul Grahame Morgan
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, State of Mississippi, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
