Cases 21 - 30 of 744
Lumsden v. Lumpkin
as 24-40689
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner:
Raymond Edward Lumsden
Thain v. Lumpkin
as 24-20465
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner:
Blake Allen Thain
Enriquez v. Lumpkin
as 24-50822
Respondent:
United States Immigration Department (ICE) Officers, Waco Police Department Officers & Probation Officer and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner:
Ricardo S. Enriquez
Enriquez v. Lumpkin
as 24-50821
Defendant:
FNU Monroe, Warden CT Terrel Unit, Mark E. Parker, Mail Room Off or Staff, CT Terrell Unit and others
Plaintiff:
Ricardo S. Enriquez
Padilla v. Lumpkin
as 24-10917
Petitioner:
Ismael Hernandez Padilla
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Webb v. Lumpkin
as 24-40655
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner:
Larry T. Webb
Cortez v. Lumpkin
as 24-50785
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner:
Corey Cortez
Clymer v. Lumpkin
as 24-40651
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner:
James Russel Clymer, Jr.
Davis v. Lumpkin
as 24-70006
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner:
Brian Edward Davis
Crowell v. Lumpkin
as 24-20429
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner:
Buford Lloyd Crowell
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
