Cases 61 - 70 of 1,265
English v. Lumpkin
as 24-40492
Plaintiff:
Charles D. English
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Panus v. Lumpkin
as 24-50588
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner:
Justin Panus
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-40488
Petitioner:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Williams v. Lumpkin
as 24-20318
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner:
Jaylan Rochard Williams, Sr.
Benton v. Lumpkin
as 24-10653
Petitioner:
Jessica Jewel Corin Benton
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Montez v. Lumpkin
as 24-50582
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner:
Miguel Angel Montez
Dalton v. Lumpkin
as 24-50579
Petitioner:
Gregory James Dalton
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Romero v. Lumpkin
as 24-50568
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner:
Victor Romero
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-40478
Petitioner:
Antonio Andres Garcia
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Indigent Department
Clark v. Collier
as 24-50569
Petitioner:
Reginald Lee Clark
Respondent:
Bryan Collier, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.