Cases 31 - 40 of 1,263
Hosea v. Lumpkin
as 24-50713
Petitioner:
Michael Hosea
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Norton v. Lumpkin
as 24-10808
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner:
Joseph Hercules Norton
White v. Lumpkin
as 24-70005
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner:
Garcia Glenn White
Carson v. Lumpkin
as 24-10854
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner:
Michael James Carson
Thain v. Lumpkin
as 24-20465
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner:
Blake Allen Thain
Enriquez v. Lumpkin
as 24-50822
Respondent:
United States Immigration Department (ICE) Officers, Waco Police Department Officers & Probation Officer and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner:
Ricardo S. Enriquez
Enriquez v. Lumpkin
as 24-50821
Defendant:
FNU Monroe, Warden CT Terrel Unit, Mark E. Parker, Mail Room Off or Staff, CT Terrell Unit and others
Plaintiff:
Ricardo S. Enriquez
Reedy v. Lumpkin
as 24-50737
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner:
Charles Reedy
Arredondo-Braaten v. Lumpkin
as 24-50673
Petitioner:
Allen Arredondo-Braaten
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Jordan v. Lumpkin
as 24-10769
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner:
Jerome Jordan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
