Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 3,225
Clark v. LumpkinCase transferred to Eastern District of Texas - Beaumont Division.
as 3:2024cv00083
Petitioner: Herbert Charles Clark
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cardenas v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01138
Petitioner: Isaac Cardenas
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01129
Petitioner: Ryan Rydell Bonner
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guzman v. Lumpkin
as 24-40186
Petitioner: Jose Garduno Guzman
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Mason v. Lumpkin
as 24-10244
Petitioner: Deondray Raymond Mason
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Mitchell v. Lumpkin
as 24-10250
Petitioner: Darrell Boyd Mitchell
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Strieder v. Lumpkin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv01065
Petitioner: Karen Marie Strieder
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonner v. Lumpkin
as 3:2024cv00090
Petitioner: Ryan Rydell Bonner
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pradia v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01045
Petitioner: Nathaniel Pradia
Defendant: Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
McCoy v. Lumpkin
as 24-40185
Petitioner: James McCoy
Respondent: Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?