Cases 11 - 20 of 3,478
Hunt v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv02157
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Feltner Dean Hunt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Green v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv03155
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Lowell Dequincy Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crowell v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv03156
Petitioner:
Buford Lloyd Crowell
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hughes v. Bexar County (Bexar County Jail) et al
as 5:2024cv00961
Defendant:
Bexar County (Bexar County Jail), Bobby Lumpkin and University Health System
Plaintiff:
Darren Tramell Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coquat v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2024cv00191
Petitioner:
James Lewis Coquat
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henderson v. Muniz et al
as 2:2024cv00175
Petitioner:
Christopher Gene Henderson
Respondent:
Senior Warden David Muniz and Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sumrell v. Lumpkin
as 2:2024cv00188
Petitioner:
Calvin Sumrell
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vineyard v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00922
Petitioner:
Jay Vineyard
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00415
Petitioner:
Frank Alonzo Jones, Jr
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGee v. Lumpkin
as 24-10737
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Petitioner:
Rickey L. McGee
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
