Cases 31 - 40 of 3,478
Farmer v. Lumpkin
as 2:2024cv00178
Petitioner:
Tyler David Edward Farmer
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Relerford v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00411
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Lynn C. Relerford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Montgomery v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv02951
Petitioner:
Michael Lee Montgomery
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cunningham v. Lumpkin Do not docket in this case. Case electronically transferred to the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division.
as 4:2024cv02949
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Rashaan Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bullock v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv02948
Petitioner:
Brian Bullock
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sandoval v. Lumpkin et al
as 6:2024cv00024
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin and Texas Department of Criminal Justice - Correctional Institutional Division
Plaintiff:
Jesse Manuel Sandoval, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. Lumpkin
as 24-10702
Petitioner:
Michael A. Powell
Respondent:
State of Texas and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
El-Bey v. Lumpkin
as 24-10704
Petitioner:
Gary Dion Allen El-Bey
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Hawthorne v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv02997
Petitioner:
Rickey Hawthorne
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Burke v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv02876
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Andrew Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
