Cases 1 - 10 of 2,202
Gonzales v. Lumpkin
as 9:2024cv00170
Petitioner:
Joe Anthony Gonzales
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Enriquez v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2024cv00454
Defendant:
FNU Alexander, Mail Room Off or Staff, FNU Adabola and others
Plaintiff:
Ricardo S. Enriquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jimenez v. Lumpkin
as 6:2024cv00028
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Jose Alfredo Jimenez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00447
Petitioner:
Douglas Eric Hill
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2024cv03256
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Bailey
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Green v. Lumpkin Case transferred to the Western District of Texas.
as 6:2024cv00446
Petitioner:
Lowell DeQuincy Green
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grinstead v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv01033
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Derek Waikiki Grinstead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv03177
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Rayford Bernard Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gordon v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv03196
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Kenneth Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzales v. Lumpkin DO NOT DOCKET. Case transferred to EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. LUFKIN DIVISION.
as 4:2024cv03216
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Joe Anthony Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
