Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 174
Dean Sanders v. Brad Cain
as 20-35660
Petitioner / Appellant: DEAN JAMES SANDERS
Respondent / Appellee: BRAD CAIN, Superintendent Snake River Correctional Inst.
Brian Jeremiah v. Mark Nooth, et al
as 20-35589
Defendant / Appellee: WHITLEY, Sgt. SRCI, JOHN/JANE DOE, whomever makes decisions on blocking Telmate messages, STILLS, Sgt. SRCI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRIAN A. JEREMIAH
Dennis Underwood v. Brad Cain
as 20-35491
Respondent / Appellee: BRAD CAIN, Superintendent Snake River Correctional Institute
Petitioner / Appellant: DENNIS BURTON UNDERWOOD
Daniel Graybill v. Brad Cain
as 20-35444
Petitioner / Appellant: DANIEL G. GRAYBILL
Respondent / Appellee: BRAD CAIN
Swinney v. Cain
as 2:2020cv00736
Petitioner: Craig Alan Swinney
Respondent: Brad Cain
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Cain
as 2:2020cv00668
Respondent: Brad Cain
Petitioner: Quinton Lewis
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott Camirand v. Brad Cain, et al
as 20-35307
Defendant / Appellee: MICHAEL HILL, Individually and in his official capacity as a Correctional Lieutenant at the Snake River Correctional Institution, BRAD CAIN, Individually and in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Snake River Correctional Institution, JOHN DOES, 1-10; Individually and in their official capacities as employees of the Oregon Department of Corrections
Plaintiff / Appellant: SCOTT LEANDER CAMIRAND
Hugo Alvarez-Reyes v. Brad Cain
as 20-35308
Petitioner / Appellant: HUGO RUFINO ALVAREZ-REYES
Respondent / Appellee: BRAD CAIN, Superintendent, Snake River Corr. Inst.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00501
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Grimsley v. Cain
as 2:2020cv00500
Petitioner: Robert Grimsley
Respondent: Brad Cain
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?