Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Santiago v. City of Rochester Police Depar
as 21-2913
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Carlos A. Santiago and Melissa A. Laffredo
Defendant / Appellee:
City of Rochester, Officer Tyshon Williams, individually and in his capacity as a City of Rochester Police Officer, Officer Joseph Bonnacci, individually and in his capacity as a City of Rochester Police Officer and others
Defendant:
District Attorney Kristen Sippel, Other Officers Names Unknown and Lieutenant Name Unknown
Culver v.Thomas, et al. (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00424
Plaintiff:
Brad Elliot Culver
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas and Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sons of Hell Motorcycle Club et al v. Arizona Department of Public Safety et al
as 3:2013cv08192
Plaintiff:
Sons of Hell Motorcycle Club , Harry Dayle Hamilton , Janice Renee Hamilton and others
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Public Safety, Robert Halliday, Unknown Halliday and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sons of Hell Motorcycle Club et al v. Arizona Department of Public Safety et al
as 3:2012cv08145
Plaintiff:
Alma Rosa Nichols, Sons of Hell Motorcycle Club, David Andrew Watts and others
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Public Safety, Robert Halliday, Unknown Halliday and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Timothy Armstrong et al v American Pallet Leasing Inc et al
as 5:2007cv04107
Defendant:
American Pallet Leasing Inc, Kirkpatrick and Lockhart, Preston, Gates, Ellis, LLP, First Southwest Company and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Armstrong, Wanda Armstrong, Todd Atenhan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Timothy Armstrong et al
as 6:2007cv02081
Plaintiff:
Timothy Armstrong, Wanda Armstrong, Todd Atenhan and others
Defendant:
American Pallet Leasing Inc, Langley, Williams and Company LLC, Daniel L Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
