Cases 21 - 30 of 2,483
Mark Adams v. Ken Paxton, et al
as 20-40360
Defendant / Appellee:
KEN PAXTON, MARK STAPLES, GREG TAYLOR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK D. ADAMS
Terrell v. Texas Board of Criminal Justice et al
as 9:2020cv00108
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Oscar Mendoza, Richard Langley and others
Plaintiff:
Sheron Gabriel Terrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2019cv03052
Respondent:
Brad Livingston, NFN Martinez, Phillips Sifuentes and others
Petitioner:
Benjamin Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams v. Paxton et al
as 6:2019cv00565
Defendant:
Mark Staples, Charles O Meador, Pennie R Kempt and others
Plaintiff:
Mark D Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Livingston et al
as 9:2019cv00172
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Warden Kevin Moore, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grohoske v. Livingston et al
as 1:2019cv00383
Plaintiff:
Diann Hazelwood Grohoske
Defendant:
Calvin R Grohoske, Non-governmental Entities, Governmental Entities and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grohoske v. Livingston et al
as 1:2019cv00384
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Calvin R Grohoske, Non-governmental Entities and others
Plaintiff:
Roy Lester Grohoske
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. State of Texas - TDCJ et al
as 4:2019cv02889
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bell
Respondent:
State of Texas - TDCJ and Brad Livingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Grohoske et al v. Livingston et al
as 1:2019cv00328
Plaintiff:
Diann Hazelwood Grohoske, Roy Lester Grohoske and David Lester Grohoske
Defendant:
Calvin R Grohoske, Non-governmental Entities, Governmental Entities and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stout v. Stephens et al
as 4:2019cv02152
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Rissie Owens, William Stephens and others
Plaintiff:
Michael L Stout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
