Cases 31 - 40 of 64
Bernard v. Huffman
as 3:2023cv00344
Plaintiff:
Willie Bernard
Defendant:
Brand Huffman
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. MS Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Erby Dean Jackson, Jr.
Defendant:
MS Dept. of Corrections, South Ms. Correctional Institution, Burl Cain and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Huffman
as 5:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Roosevelt Washington
Defendant:
Brand Huffman
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Huffman
as 5:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Alvin Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Superintendent Brand Huffman
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gray v. Huffman
as 23-60212
Petitioner / Appellant:
Natyyo Gray
Respondent / Appellee:
Superintendent Brand Huffman
Whittle v. Huffman
as 1:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Tremayne Whittle
Defendant:
Brand Huffman
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Coleman et al
as 1:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Cortez Deon Williams
Defendant:
Lee S. Coleman and Brand Huffman
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Huffman
as 3:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Thomas Earl Ellis
Defendant:
Brand Huffman
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ellis v. Huffman
as 3:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Thomas Earl Ellis
Defendant:
Brand Huffman
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cannady v. Huffman
as 23-60004
Petitioner / Appellant:
Cornelius Cannady
Respondent / Appellee:
Brand Huffman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
