Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Gabriel v. Vermont Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Timothy Michael Gabriel
Defendant:
Vermont Department of Corrections, Chandler Corbett, Brandon Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. National Football League
as 1:2022cv10743
Plaintiff:
Israel James and Brandon Hughes
Defendant:
National Football League
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gooch v. Charles et al
as 3:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
Tony Gooch
Defendant:
Jennifer Charles, Steve Dozier, Justin Vaughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPEARS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv70331
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON HUGH SPEARS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cook v. McLelland et al
as 1:2019cv00404
Defendant:
Childersburg, City of, Mark Holmes, Richard McLelland and others
Plaintiff:
Lanessa Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00599
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Gaetan et al
as 4:2017cv00018
Plaintiff:
Brandon Hughes
Defendant:
Samson Gaetan and Transport Gilmyr, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hughes v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2016cv00130
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, Texas Correctional Industries and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2012cv03695
Plaintiff:
Jenny Hughes and Brandon Hughes
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
