Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Conley v. Shea Development Corp et al
as 2:2010cv01428
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Anne Conley
Defendant:
Shea Development Corp and Bravera Inc
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Camofi Master LDC et al v. Riptide Worldwide, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv04020
Plaintiff:
Camofi Master LDC and Camhzn Master LDC.
Defendant:
Riptide Worldwide, Inc., Bravera, Inc., IP Holdings of Nevada, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Shea Development Corp. et al v. Watson et al
as 1:2009mc00014
Plaintiff:
Shea Development Corp., Bravera, Inc. and IP Holding of Nevada Corp.
Defendant:
Christopher Watson and Elizabeth Anne Conley
Shea Development Corp. et al v. Watson et al
as 2:2009ms00023
Plaintiff:
Shea Development Corp., Bravera, Inc. and IP Holding Of Nevada Corp.
Defendant:
Christopher Watson and Elizabeth Anne Conley
Shea Development Corp. et al v. Watson et al
as 1:2009mi00114
Plaintiff:
Shea Development Corp., Bravera, Inc. and IP Holding of Nevada Corp.
Defendant:
Christopher Watson and Elizabeth Anne Conley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963 Registration of judgment from another district
Shea Development Corp. et al v. Watson et al
as 6:2009mc00017
Plaintiff:
Shea Development Corp., Bravera, Inc. and IP Holding of Nevada Corp.
Defendant:
Christopher Watson and Elizabeth Anne Conley
Riptide Worldwide, Inc. et al v. Watson et al
as 3:2009mc00025
Plaintiff:
Riptide Worldwide, Inc., Bravera Inc and IP Holdings of Nevada Corp
Defendant:
Christopher Watson and Elizabeth Anne Conley
Watson v. Bravera Inc et al
as 2:2008cv00081
Plaintiff:
Chris Watson
Defendant:
Bravera Inc, Bravera Inc, Shea Development Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Bravera, Inc. v. United States Department of Defense
as 1:2007cv00234
Plaintiff:
Bravera, Inc.
Defendant:
United States Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
