Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 173
Dixon v. Kempf et al
as 1:2016cv00119
Plaintiff: Daniel Dixon
Defendant: Kevin Kempf, Brent Reinke, Robin Sandy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hogue et al v. White et al
as 1:2016cv00085
Plaintiff: Brian Elliott Hogue, Gary A Butts, Gerald E Lind and others
Defendant: Corizon Health Services, LLC, Beeken Petty O'Keefe & Company, PharmaCorr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. Corrections Corporation of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00011
Defendant: Nancy Alyk, Katherine Livi, Debra Waters and others
Plaintiff: Michael T Hayes, Albert Pete Veenstra, III, Lonnie L Haggard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood et al v. Panther et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00092
Defendant: Paul Panther, Mark Kubinski, Brent Reinke and others
Plaintiff: Lance Wood and Renee Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Idaho Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2015cv00062
Plaintiff: David Morgan
Defendant: Idaho Department of Corrections, Brent Reinke, Kevin Kempf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dill v. Goleck et al
as 1:2015cv00063
Plaintiff: Michael S Dill
Defendant: Christian Goleck, Scott Schaffer, Jen Brewler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shriver v. Reinke et al
as 1:2015cv00001
Plaintiff: Donald Peters Shriver
Defendant: Brent Reinke, Ramirez, Officers of the Idaho Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-36110
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Wurtz v. Reinke
as 1:2014cv00515
Petitioner: Mark Wurtz
Respondent: Brent Reinke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Caldwell v. Reinke
as 1:2014cv00516
Petitioner: Clay T Caldwell
Respondent: Brent Reinke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?