Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Fair Debt Collection Act
HOWARD v. RIHL et al
as 2:2019cv05905
Defendant:
DAVID HECKLER, BRIAN HESSENTHALER, TED KRIMMEL
and others
Plaintiff:
BRANDON HOWARD
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv03468
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
and others
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Job Discrimination (Employment)
WOODELL v. PA. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AT GRATERFORD et al
as 2:2018cv01098
Plaintiff:
RANCOURT WOODELL
Defendant:
MIKE WENEROWICZ, JAY LANE, G. GALINSKI
and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
DAUGHERTY et al v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2017cv00368
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. DAUGHERTY , LABMD, INC.
Defendant:
JOEL P. ADAMS , DAVID J. BECKER , ROBERT J. BOBACK
and others
Cause Of Action: Racketeering (RICO) Act
ALLEN v. MCGRODY et al
as 2:2016cv02756
Plaintiff:
EUNICE ALLEN
Defendant:
JOHN MCGRODY, ROOSEVELT POPLAR, BRIAN MCLAUGHLIN
and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
CARTER v. KANE et al
as 1:2016cv00036
Plaintiff:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant:
KATHLEEN G. KANE, BRIAN V. COLEMAN, JAMES C. BARNACLE
and others
Cause Of Action: pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CARTER v. KANE et al
as 1:2016cv00007
Plaintiff:
HOWARD A. CARTER
Defendant:
KATHLEEN G. KANE, BRIAN COLEMEN, DARRELL O. DUGAN
and others
Cause Of Action: pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PAULEY et al v. SAMUELS et al
as 1:2015cv00158
Plaintiff:
OVERTON WAYNE PAULEY, ZACHARY T. KING, DAVID J. GOWER
and others
Defendant:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. , BOBBY L. MEEKS , HOWARD BARRON
and others
Cause Of Action: pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BANKS v. PIVNICHNY et al
as 2:2015cv00700
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PIVNICHNY, JAMES COMEY, BARACK OBAMA
and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
