Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Baker v. Lancaster County District Court Adult Probation
as 8:2023cv00410
Petitioner:
Brian Baker
Respondent:
Lancaster County District Court Adult Probation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Comer v. Baker et al
as 1:2021cv00799
Plaintiff:
Robert S Comer
Defendant:
Warden's Assist Brian Baker, Warden's Clerk Tyra Parker, R.I.B. Chairman Officer Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watts v. Baker et al
as 3:2021cv00827
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Allen Watts
Defendant:
Brian Baker and Shawn Gary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson-Barker v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01234
Plaintiff:
Lisa Jonson-Barker and Lisa Johnson-Barker
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Illinois Department of Corrections, Robert Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson-Barker v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv01034
Plaintiff:
Lisa Johnson-Barker
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Illinois Department of Corrections, Robert Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Briggs v. Baker
as 3:2020cv04243
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Briggs
Defendant:
Nie Julie, B. James, Arron Chapmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Baker et al
as 5:2020cv00199
Defendant:
Mayor Linda Gorton, Chief Lawrence Weathers, Brian Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Deville et al
as 2:2019cv09400
Plaintiff:
Brian Baker
Defendant:
James Keith Deville
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Voss v. Baker
as 1:2017cv00626
Plaintiff:
Craig William Voss
Defendant:
Brian Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. U.S. Marshal et al
as 6:2016cv00070
Petitioner:
Brian Baker
Respondent:
U.S. Marshal, Warden and DSCC Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
