Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Minto v. 165 Cafe Corp. et al
as 7:2023cv10735
Plaintiff:
Kemar Minto
Defendant:
165 Cafe Corp. d/b/a Hudson Grille, Brian Mahon and 165 Cafe Corp. doing business as Hudson Grille
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Equal Rights Under the Law
Schipke v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2017cv02087
Plaintiff:
Mary Elizabeth Schipke
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, City Of Meriden, Meriden Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. New York City et al
as 1:2017cv08760
Plaintiff:
Noah Harris
Defendant:
New York City, Fairoze Edoo, Brian Mahon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Barrick v. City of Indianapolis, et al
as 15-2591
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT BARRICK
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, RICHARD HITE, Chief of Police, IMPD, BRIAN MAHONE, Commander, IMPD and others
Robert Barrick v. City of Indianapolis, et al
as 15-1146
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT BARRICK
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, RICHARD HITE, Chief of Police, IMPD, BRIAN MAHONE, Commander, IMPD and others
BARRICK v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2014cv01137
Defendant:
KIRK BARRICK, TERESA BARRICK, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BARRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pruitt v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv03969
Defendant:
Police Officer Daniel Berardi, Police Officer Raul Colon, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Pruitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pruitt v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv00412
Plaintiff:
Ronald Pruitt
Defendant:
The City of New York, Raymond J. Kelly, Joseph M. Gulotta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SRIVASTAVA v. BAYH et al
as 1:2012cv01295
Defendant:
AFNI, INC., MARK BANNATYNE, JOHN BARTHOLOMEW and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN HERZ SRIVASTAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
