Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Baccus v. Stirling et al
as 9:2020cv04299
Respondent:
Brian Peter Stirling, Nelson Kenneth and Kenneth Nelson
Petitioner:
John Roosevelt Baccus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Phoenix Police Department et al
as 2:2018cv03041
Defendant:
Samuel Dicarlo, Unknown Augustine, Christine Reda and others
Plaintiff:
Daris L Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McQuillan v. USA
as 0:2017cv00257
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Brian Peter McQuillan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Christopher Peters v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 17-10129
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER BRIAN PETERS
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Brian Giannolla v. USA
as 16-12628
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRIAN PETER GIANNOLLA
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Giannolla v. United States of America
as 8:2016cv00966
Plaintiff:
Brian Peter Giannolla
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Peters v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2013cv02583
Petitioner:
Christopher Brian Peters
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Drum v. Phoenix Police Department et al
as 2:2012cv00553
Plaintiff:
Jamie Carl Drum
Defendant:
Phoenix Police Department, Equal Housing Opportunity, Arizona Department of Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2010cv00236
Plaintiff:
Isiah Romont Hill
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Iafrate & Associates, Brian Peter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2009cv01155
Plaintiff:
Isiah Romont Hill
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Arizona, State of, Phoenix Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
