Cases 1 - 10 of 204
Crusan v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv00702
Plaintiff:
Michael Crusan, Sr
Defendant:
Brian Williams, Sr., Medical Director, Aurom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Ely State Prison Staff, et al.
as 24-1699
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM REUBART
Plaintiff:
AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant:
ELY STATE PRISON STAFF, STEVEN SISOLAK, BARBARA CEGAVSKE and others
Henderson v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
Michael R. Henderson
Defendant:
Calvin Johnson, Brian Williams, Sr., Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Daniels, et al.
as 24-878
Plaintiff:
AMMAR HARRIS
Defendant:
CHARLES DANIELS, BRIAN WILLIAMS, SR., MICHAEL MINEV and others
Paduani v. Johnson et al
as 3:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Neftali Paduani
Defendant:
Calvin Johnson, Brian Williams, Sr., Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pattison v. Lombardo, et al.
as 24-478
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANTE H PATTISON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE LOMBARDO, BRIAN SANDOVAL, STEVE SISOLAK and others
Willing v. Hutchings, et al.
as 24-205
Petitioner / Appellant:
NICHOLAS JAMES WILLING
Respondent / Appellee:
WILLIAM HUTCHINGS, Substituted in place of Brian Williams, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA and ADAM LAXALT
Respondent:
BRIAN WILLIAMS, SR.
Walsh v. Tristan et al
as 2:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Robert Walsh
Defendant:
David Tristan, Glenda Stewart, Moka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VanHorn v. Williams, et al.
as 23-3647
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD L. VANHORN
Respondent / Appellee:
BRIAN WILLIAMS, SR. and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Farvela v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2023cv01666
Plaintiff:
Saul Farvela
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Brian Williams, Sr. and Julie Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
