Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Todd v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2018cv00265
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Brian Wilson Todd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Lonnie Banark v. Adams, et al
as 17-17085
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE LEE BANARK
Defendant - Appellee:
ADAMS, Assistant Warden of Operations, AARON BROWN, Investigator, B. CLARK, Registered Nurse and others
Wilson v. Tesla, Inc.
as 3:2017cv03763
Defendant:
Tesla, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Brian Wilson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Lonnie Banark v. Adams, et al
as 17-15674
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE LEE BANARK
Defendant - Appellee:
ADAMS, Assistant Warden of Operations, AARON BROWN, Investigator, B. CLARK, Registered Nurse and others
Lonnie Banark v. Adams, et al
as 17-15006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE LEE BANARK
Defendant - Appellee:
ADAMS, Assistant Warden of Operations, AARON BROWN, Investigator, B. CLARK, Registered Nurse and others
Lonnie Banark v. Adams, et al
as 16-16793
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE LEE BANARK
Defendant - Appellee:
ADAMS, Assistant Warden of Operations, AARON BROWN, Investigator, B. CLARK, Registered Nurse and others
Lonnie Banark v. Adams, et al
as 16-16397
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE LEE BANARK
Defendant - Appellee:
ADAMS, AARON BROWN, Investigator, B. CLARK, Registered Nurse and others
Miller v. Williams et al
as 2:2016cv00895
Defendant:
Allen, Bogue, E. Castillo and others
Plaintiff:
Graham Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banark v. Adams et al
as 2:2015cv00546
Defendant:
Adams, Aaron Brown, B. Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Lee Banark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frank Amador et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05671
Plaintiff:
Frank Amador, Jr, Maurice Brunel, Wallace Carr and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
