Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00882
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
GARCIA v. Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC,
as 0:2022cv60587
Plaintiff:
YANET GARCIA
Defendant:
Bridgestone Retail Operations, LLC, a Delaware limited company, d/b/a/ TIRES PLUS, and Bridgestone Americas, Inc. doing business as Tires Plus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00623
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Rivas De Jesus v. Bridgestone Americas, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00334
Defendant:
BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS, INC. and BRIDGESTONE AMERICAS TIRE OPERATIONS, LLC
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE E. RIVAS DE JESUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv24770
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv60963
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCart v. Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC
as 3:2015cv00435
Plaintiff:
Laurie McCart
Defendant:
Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv01446
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HALL et al v. American Honda Motor Company Inc et al
as 0:2013cv61342
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE GILMER HALL and Mary Hall
Defendant:
American Honda Motor Company Inc, ARVINMERITOR INC, Borg-Warner Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
