Cases 1 - 10 of 260
Banana v. Brookhart
as 3:2024cv01109
Petitioner:
Donald Banana
Defendant:
Dee Dee Brookhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dalcollo v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Justin Dalcollo
Defendant:
Dee Dee Brookhart, Warden Brown, Alisha Curtwright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jerome Johnson v. Deanna Brookhart
as 24-1240
Petitioner:
JEROME R. JOHNSON
Respondent:
DEANNA BROOKHART, Warden
Robinson v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
George Robinson
Defendant:
Dee Dee Brookhart, Lorie Cunningham, Wexford Health Source, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Brookhart
as 1:2024cv00086
Petitioner:
Markeas D. Brown
Respondent:
People of the State of Illinois and Dr. Deanna Brookhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roman v. Illinois State et al
as 1:2023cv01458
Petitioner:
Luis Roman
Respondent:
Illinois State, Illinois Department of Corrections, Lawrence Correctional Center and others
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shabazz v. Boose et al
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Malik Shabazz
Defendant:
Dr. Boose, Sgt Bridwell, Sgt Stout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Courtney Ealy v. Dee Dee Brookhart
as 23-3341
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COURTNEY EALY
Defendant / Appellee:
DEE DEE BROOKHART
Gardner v. Brookhart
as 3:2023cv03337
Plaintiff:
DeShawn Gardner
Respondent:
Deanna M. Brookhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2023cv03744
Plaintiff:
Jerome R. Johnson
Defendant:
Dr. Deanna Brookhart, Latoya Bayler and J. B. Pritzker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
