Cases 41 - 46 of 46
San Carlos Apache Tribe of Arizona et al v. Sunset Ditch Company et al
as 4:1931cv00061
Intervenor Plaintiff:
San Carlos Apache Tribe of Arizona, Gila River Indian Community, Gila River Indian Community
and others
Defendant:
Sunset Ditch Company, Letha Bennett, Crooked Pole Ranch
and others
Movant:
Lower Gila Water Users
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Water Rights
Attorney General for Oklahoma, et al v. Tyson Foods, Inc., et al
as 08-5154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, State of Oklahoma, ex rel. W.A. Drew Edmondson, in his capacity as Attorney General, FDBA W.A. Drew Edmondson, OFFICE OF THE OKLAHOMA SECRETARY OF THE ENVIRONMENT, State of Oklahoma, ex rel. C. Miles Tolbert in his capacity as the Trustee for Natural Resources for the State of Oklahoma
Defendant - Appellee:
CARGILL TURKEY PRODUCTION, LLC, CAL-MAINE FOODS, INC., CARGILL, INC.
and others
Defendant-Third-Party-Defendant:
TAHLEQUAH LIVESTOCK AUCTION, INC.
Defendant:
RANDY ALLEN, BIG JOHN'S, CHICKEN CREEK VILLAGE STORE
and others
Third-Party-Defendant:
JOHN E. ADAIR, JOHN W. ADAIR, VIRGINIA W. ADAIR
and others
Third Party Defendant, Counter Claimant:
CITY OF WATTS
Intervenor:
ARKANSAS NATURAL RESOURCES COMMISSION, STATE OF ARKANSAS
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF ARKANSAS
Movant:
AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, NATIONAL CATTLEMEN'S BEEF ASSOCIATION, TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF DAIRYMEN
and others
USA v. Brooks
as 07-50736
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAY LEN BROOKS
Cintas Corporation v. Andrews et al
as 3:2006cv05107
Petitioner:
Cintas Corporation
Respondent:
Joe Andrews, Mitchell Aron Beard , Melvin Pearson
and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Arbitration Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2006cv05140
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Arbitration Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
