Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. BNSF Railway Company
as 1:2024cv01158
Plaintiff:
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2023cv16579
Petitioner:
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Respondent:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Unified System Division, Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 8:2023cv00442
Petitioner:
Unified System Division, Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 153 National Railroad Adjustment Board
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES DIVISION OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS v. Keolis Commuter Services, LLC
as 1:2023cv10587
Plaintiff:
BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES DIVISION OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS
Defendant:
Keolis Commuter Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corp. d/b/a METRA v. International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers - Transportation Division et al
as 1:2021cv05988
Plaintiff:
Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corp. d/b/a METRA and Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Rail Corporation
Defendant:
International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers - Transportation Division, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen and Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Alliance of Police, Chapter 267
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers-Transportation Division et al
as 1:2021cv05622
Plaintiff:
Norfolk Southern Railway Co. and Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Defendant:
International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, Transportation Division, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters
as 8:2020cv00516
Defendant:
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes, Division, IBT v. BNSF Railway Company
as 1:2019cv08365
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes, Division, IBT
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. BNSF Railway Company
as 1:2019cv08367
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Plaintiff:
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Green v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters
as 1:2012cv00069
Plaintiff:
Paul Green
Defendant:
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
