Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Brotman Medical Center, Inc. v. Sylvia Mathews Burwell
as 2:2014cv06603
Plaintiff:
Brotman Medical Center, Inc.
Defendant:
Sylvia Mathews Burwell
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-56905
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Shirley Stradford v. Brotman Medical Center, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv07070
Defendant:
Brotman Medical Center, Inc. and Does
Plaintiff:
Shirley Stradford
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv07030
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Michael Waters v. City of Culver City, et al
as 12-55585
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL EARL WATERS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CULVER CITY, BROTMAN MEDICAL CENTER, INC., DON PEDERSEN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv05255
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Willie Lue James et al v. Brotman Medical Center Inc et al
as 2:2011cv03915
Defendant:
Brotman Medical Center Inc, Lisa Gail Davis, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Lue James, Addie Mae Harris Rogers and Lawrence Charles Rogers
In re: Brotman Medical Center, Inc.
as 11-55200
Debtor:
In the Matter of: BROTMAN MEDICAL CENTER, INC., a California corporation
Appellant:
PROSPECT MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation and BROTMAN MEDICAL CENTER, INC., a California corporation
Intervenor:
BROTMAN MEDICAL CENTER, INC. CREDITOR TRUST
Appellee:
JACOB TERNER, an individual and HERTA AND PAUL AMIR FAMILY TRUST, DATED FEBRUARY 13, 1987
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv04933
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In re: Brotman Medical Center, Inc., et al v. Brotman Medical Center, Inc.
as 09-56907
Debtor:
In the Matter of: BROTMAN MEDICAL CENTER, INC.
Appellant:
PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES, LLC
Appellee:
BROTMAN MEDICAL CENTER, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
