Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Pattison v. The State of Nevada, Ex Rel, Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv00020
Defendant:
Bruce Bannister, Francis Chelli, Donni K Jennings and others
Plaintiff:
Dante H. Pattison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lance Reberger v. Renee Baker, et al
as 13-17135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LANCE REBERGER
Defendant - Appellee:
RENEE BAKER, ADAM WATSON, MICHAEL BYRNE, Administrative Law Judge and others
Reberger v. Baker et al
as 3:2013cv00378
Defendant:
Renee Baker, Bruce Bannister, Mr. Baze and others
Plaintiff:
Lance Reberger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Todd Honeycutt v. Sandy Snider, et al
as 12-16360
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TODD M. HONEYCUTT
Defendant - Appellee:
SANDY SNIDER, JOHN PERRY and BRUCE BANNISTER
Michael Cox v. James Benedetti, et al
as 11-16760
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL STEVE COX
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES BENEDETTI, AKA J. Benedetti, BRUCE BANNISTER, AKA Bannister, DON HELLING, AKA D. Helling and others
Honeycutt v. Snider et al
as 3:2011cv00393
Defendant:
Bruce Bannister, John Perry and Sandy Snider
Plaintiff:
Todd M. Honeycutt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cox v. Benedetti et al
as 3:2010cv00129
Defendant:
Mary Babb, Bruce Bannister, James Benedetti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Manley v. Nevada Department of Correctio, et al
as 09-17177
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES MANLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BRUCE BANNISTER, JOHN SCOTT and others
Scott v. Atkins-St. Rose et al
as 2:2008cv01334
Plaintiff:
George Scott
Defendant:
Lavonne Atkins-St. Rose, Howard Skolnik, Nevin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Morrow v. Skolnik et al
as 3:2008cv00274
Plaintiff:
Richard David Morrow
Defendant:
Howard Skolnik, Bruce Bannister and John Scott
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
