Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Lillie Burroughs v. Bruister & Associates, Inc., et al
as 12-12326
Petitioner - Appellant:
LILLIE C. BURROUGHS
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUISTER & ASSOCIATES, INC., a.k.a., DIRECTTV, INC. and MARY HILL
Tanecia Turner v. Bruister & Assoc., Inc.
as 12-11006
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TANECIA TURNER
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUISTER & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Johnson v. Directv, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv01767
Plaintiff:
Phillip D. Johnson
Defendant:
Directv, Inc. and Bruister & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Bruister & Associates, Inc.
as 4:2008cv00149
Plaintiff:
Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company
Defendant:
Bruister & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Turner v. Bruister & Associates, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv02331
Plaintiff:
Tanecia Turner
Defendant:
Bruister & Associates, Inc. and DIRECTV, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Allen v. Bruister & Associates, Inc.
as 1:2007cv00479
Plaintiff:
Terry F. Allen
Defendant:
Bruister & Associates, Inc. and Bruister & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
