Cases 11 - 20 of 942
Mohsin Syed v. Bryan Collier, TDCJ Director
as 7:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
Mohsin M Syed
Defendant:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gaines v. Collier
as 3:2024cv00457
Petitioner:
Ernest Edward Gaines
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Canfield v. Collier et al
as 6:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee Canfield
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Timothy Fitzpatrick, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robertson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Laneil Robertson
Respondent:
Bryan Collier, Michael W Collier, Jennifer S Crozby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Massey v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
Ross Massey
Respondent:
Bryan Collier and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bostice v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Bostice
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin and Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wedgeworth v. Collier et al
as 7:2024cv00014
Petitioner:
James Scott Wedgeworth
Respondent:
Bryan Collier, Jimmy Smith, Henry Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bonner v. Collier et al
as 1:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Charles Bonner
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Texas Parole Board and Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hillman v. Hillman et al
as 9:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Danny A. Hillman
Defendant:
Michelle Hillman, Diane Robinson, Sugar Tiffany Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Collier
as 3:2024cv00175
Petitioner:
Bobby Gonzales
Respondent:
Bryan Collier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
