Cases 1 - 8 of 8
New York Hotel Trades Council, et al v. IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., et al
as 19-16744
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGE FREDERICK WILKINSON,, BRYAN M. REASONS, IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NEW YORK HOTEL TRADES COUNCIL & HOTEL ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITY, INC. PENSION FUND, Lead Plaintiff, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
GREG FLEMING
Fleming v. Impax Laboratories Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv06557
Plaintiff:
Greg Fleming
Defendant:
Impax Laboratories Inc., George Frederick Wilkinson, Larry Hsu and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 478 v. Hsu et al
as 3:2014cv04980
Plaintiff:
International Union of Operating Engineers Local 478
Defendant:
Larry Hsu, G. Frederick Wilkinson, Leslie Z. Benet and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nichols Karant v. Larry Hsu et al
as 3:2014cv04313
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Karant
Defendant:
Larry Hsu , Arthur A. Koch , Bryan M. Reasons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wickey v. Hsu et al
as 3:2014cv04266
Plaintiff:
Randall K. Wickey
Defendant:
Larry Hsu , G. Frederick Wilkinson , Leslie Z. Benet and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
linus Aruliah v. Impax Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv03673
Plaintiff:
Linus Aruliah
Defendant:
Impax Laboratories, Inc., Larry Hsu, G. Frederick Wilkinson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Haverhill Retirement System v. Impax Laboratories, Inc., et al
as 3:2013cv01566
Plaintiff:
Haverhill Retirement System
Defendant:
Impax Laboratories, Inc., , Larry Hsu , Arthur A. Koch and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Mulligan v. Impax Laboratories, Inc., et al
as 3:2013cv01037
Plaintiff:
Denis Mulligan
Defendant:
Impax Laboratories, Inc., Larry Hsu, Arthur A. Koch and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
