Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Bryan Bernard v. Siji Thomas, et al
as 22-15662
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRYAN BERNARD, AKA Bryan Mornyngstarr Bernard, AKA Thyone R. A. Mornyngstarr
Defendant / Appellee:
SIJI THOMAS, Nurse Practitioner (NP) at Eyman Complex, Cook Unit, RODNEY STEWART, Medical Doctor (MD)/Director at Eyman Complex, CENTURION MEDICAL, Contracted Medical Provider of AZDORR at Eyman Complex and others
Bernard #312787 v. Thomas et al
as 2:2021cv01215
Plaintiff:
Bryan Bernard, Bryan Mornyngstarr Bernard and Thyone R A Mornyngstarr
Defendant:
Siji Thomas and Rodney Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bernard v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2015cv02217
Plaintiff:
Bryan Mornyngstarr Bernard
Defendant:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02124
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355
Bernard v. Yuma County Detention Center
as 2:2013cv00358
Petitioner:
Bryan Mornyngstarr Bernard
Respondent:
Yuma County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bernard v. Valley Street Jail
as 1:2012cv00509
Plaintiff:
Bryan Mornyngstarr Bernard
Defendant:
Valley Street Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernard v. New Hampshire, State of
as 1:2012cv00508
Plaintiff:
Bryan Mornyngstarr Bernard
Defendant:
Manchester Police Department, State of New Hampshire and Valley Street Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernard v. Ballos
as 2:2012cv02171
Plaintiff:
Bryan Mornyngstarr Bernard
Defendant:
John Ballos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bernard v. Martinez
as 2:2012cv02174
Defendant:
Unknown Martinez
Plaintiff:
Bryan Mornyngstarr Bernard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
