Cases 1 - 10 of 116
Adib Makdessi v. Bryan Watson
as 23-6573
Petitioner / Appellant:
ADIB EDDIE RAMEZ MAKDESSI, a/k/a Eddie Makdessi
Respondent / Appellee:
BRYAN WATSON, Warden of Wallens Ridge State Prison
Adib Makdessi v. Bryan Watson
as 22-6397
Petitioner / Appellant:
ADIB EDDIE RAMEZ MAKDESSI, a/k/a Eddie Makdessi
Respondent / Appellee:
BRYAN WATSON, Warden of Wallens Ridge State Prison
Watson v. Lemaster
as 0:2021cv00077
Petitioner:
Bryan Watson
Respondent:
Lemaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Makdessi v. Watson
as 3:2020cv00872
Respondent:
Bryan Watson
Petitioner:
Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adib Eddie Ramez Makdessi v. Bryan Watson
as 18-6074
Petitioner - Appellant:
ADIB EDDIE RAMEZ MAKDESSI, a/k/a Eddie Makdessi
Respondent - Appellee:
BRYAN WATSON, Warden of Wallens Ridge State Prison
Makadessi v. Watson
as 3:2018cv00019
Petitioner:
Adib Eddie Ramez Makadessi
Respondent:
Bryan Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Leonard Carter, Jr. v. Henry Hudson
as 17-6632
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEONARD CARTER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MR. A. DAVID ROBINSON, Commonwealth of Virginia Chief Corrections Operations, MR. BRYAN WATSON, Commonwealth of Virginia The Virginia Department of Corrections, MR. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Commonwealth of Virginia Director for the Virginia Department of Corrections and others
Carter v. Hudson et al
as 3:2016cv00644
Plaintiff:
Leonard Carter, Jr.
Defendant:
Henry E. Hudson, Harold W. Clarke, A. David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Adib Makdessi v. Bryan Watson
as 16-6852
Petitioner - Appellant:
ADIB EDDIE RAMEZ MAKDESSI, a/k/a Eddie Makdessi
Respondent - Appellee:
BRYAN WATSON, Warden of Wallens Ridge State Prison
Issac Patterson v. Harold Clark
as 15-6572
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ISSAC D. PATTERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
HAROLD CLARK, Director Virginia/D.O.C., BRYAN WATSON, Warden, JERRY R. TOWNSEND, Assistant Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
