Cases 1 - 10 of 292
Guy v. Burch
as 1:2024cv00115
Petitioner:
Vernon Guy
Respondent:
Paul Burch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WASHINGTON v. WATKINS et al
as 3:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
MARLO WASHINGTON
Defendant:
WATKINS, T FRAZURE, J BURCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMMONS v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW TYRONE SIMMONS
Defendant:
RICKY D DIXON, GARY HEWETT and D BURCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Taylor, III, Deborah R. Mangum, Leonard K. Sweatman and others
Defendant:
Piedmont Healthcare, Inc. and University Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
MADISON v. BERRY et al
as 5:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
TERRELL MADISON
Defendant:
WARDEN WALTER BERRY, MR CLARK, MR GARDENER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Burch et al
as 8:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Eugene Randall Jones and Randall Eugene Jones
Defendant:
Kyle Everett Burch and Hirschbach Motor Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05650
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Burch v. Publix Employee Federal Credit Union
as 8:2023cv02778
Plaintiff:
Rahman Al-meen Burch
Defendant:
Publix Employee Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Stanback v. Evans et al
as 1:2023cv00451
Plaintiff:
James Stanback
Defendant:
Officer Evans and Paul Burch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DANIELS v. ARROYO et al
as 4:2023cv00476
Plaintiff:
DARRYL C DANIELS
Defendant:
CHRISTINE L ARROYO, MS HEMLINGER, MRS MCCALPIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
