Cases 1 - 10 of 202
Burch v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2024cv05286
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Burch
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Byrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samperi v. Nagi et al
as 1:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Mark Anthony Samperi
Defendant:
Kendra Nagi, Connor Burch, Strodtbeck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Burch v. Novo Nordisk A/S, et al.
as 1:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Katelyn Burch
Defendant:
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk North America Operations A/S, Novo Nordisk US Holdings Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Michael Burch v. LAPD Metropolitan et al
as 2:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
Michael Burch
Defendant:
LAPD Metropolitan, Officer Saephanh, Officer Vinueza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Burch v. The State of California
as 2:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Michael Burch
Defendant:
The State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Randle v. Contra Costa Cnty. Super. Ct.
as 3:2023cv05799
Plaintiff:
Jason Thomas and Ramello D. Randle
Defendant:
Contra Costa County Superior Court of Martinez, Judge Horimoto, Judge Tharesa Canepa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Burch v. State of New York
as 2:2023cv09057
Plaintiff:
Michael Burch
Defendant:
State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv09015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
