Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Matava v. Bureau of Federal Prisons
as 3:2024cv00757
Petitioner:
John E Matava
Respondent:
Bureau of Federal Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ryan v. Bureau of Federal Prisons
as 3:2023cv01365
Petitioner:
Aysia Ryan
Respondent:
Bureau of Federal Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Draper v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 19-6091
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERNEST DRAPER
Respondent / Appellee:
BUREAU OF FEDERAL PRISONS and STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Draper et al v. United States et al
as 5:2019cv00128
Plaintiff:
Danny Armstrong, Cleve Billings, Mark Schemm and others
Defendant:
Mary Fallin, State of Oklahoma, John Wetzel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Draper et al v. United States et al
as 3:2018cv01047
Plaintiff:
Danny Armstrong, Cleve Billings, Mark Schemm and others
Defendant:
Mary Fallin, State of Oklahoma, John Wetzel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Draper v. United States et al
as 5:2018cv01070
Defendant:
OKLAHOMA, GOVERNOR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Draper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DRAPER v. UNITED STATES et al
as 3:2018cv00202
Defendant:
OKLAHOMA, GOVERNOR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS and others
Plaintiff:
ERNEST DRAPER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Bureau of Federal Prisons et al
as 9:2013cv01346
Plaintiff:
Zljahuc Logan James
Defendant:
Bureau of Federal Prisons and BOP Estill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Lindsey v. Pierce-Varela et al.
as 1:2011cv02354
Petitioner:
Victor Teon Lindsey, II
Respondent:
USP Prison Bureau Florence Federal Prison, Cesar Pierce-Varela and Charles A. Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WILSON v. WERLINGER et al
as 3:2011cv00032
Plaintiff:
CAMERON WILSON
Defendant:
ROBERT WERLINGER, FCI LORETTO and BUREAU OF FEDERAL PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
