Cases 21 - 30 of 76
Suri v. United States of America et al
as 5:2021ct03108
Defendant:
Warden Craig Apker, L. Lindsley, John Doe Warden #3 and others
Plaintiff:
Bill Suri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Suri v. United States of America et al
as 5:2021cv00185
Defendant:
Warden Craig Apker, L. Lindsley, John Doe Warden #3 and others
Plaintiff:
Bill Suri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Durio v. Federal Bureau of Prisons "BOP"
as 4:2020cv01334
Petitioner:
Cliff A. Durio
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons "BOP"
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Timothy Edwards v. Warden J.W. Cox, et al
as 20-2329
Defendant / Appellee:
FPC Yankton, Mrs. Allen, Bureau of Prisons, (BOP) and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Timothy Edwards
Dov v. Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2020cv04343
Petitioner:
Petitioner Shayeh Dov
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons(BOP)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Taylor et al v. U.S. Department of Justice, et al
as 1:2020cv00224
Defendant:
Mikael Rivera, Edward Balacua, Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and others
Plaintiff:
Loretta Taylor and Atlantica Tanuvasa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McVay v. United States et al
as 1:2020cv00064
Defendant:
United States, Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and Mid-Atlantic Regional Office
Plaintiff:
Franklin Tuck McVay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arthur Moler v. Christopher Mabe, et al
as 20-5077
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN O'BRIEN, Chief Administrator DSCC, L. VAUGHN, OIC SHU Officer, THOMAS BRANSCUM, Camp Secretary and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR FLEMMING MOLER
Flowers v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
as 1:2019cv09417
Petitioner:
Joe N. Flowers
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Lobacz v. The United States of America, et al
as 5:2019cv00453
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons (BOP) Medical and Other Staff John Does 1-10 and The United States of America
Petitioner:
Frank M. Lobacz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
