Cases 31 - 40 of 48
Levi Springer v. C/O Brown #1
as 13-7376
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEVI SPRINGER
Defendant - Appellee:
C/O BROWN, #1 and C/O BROWN, #2
Defendant:
RANDALL MATHENA, Warden, U. M. KILLBOURNE, SERGEANT MIDDLETON and others
Crawford v. Kalahan et al
as 3:2013cv00466
Plaintiff:
Marcus Crawford
Defendant:
Major Kalaher, C/O Browning, C/O Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Levi Springer v. C/O Brown
as 13-6508
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEVI SPRINGER
Defendant - Appellee:
C/O BROWN, #1, C/O BROWN, #2, Q.M.H.P. BULLION and others
Defendant:
CURTIS PARR, Regional Ombudsman, RANDALL MATHENA, Warden, U. M. KILLBOURNE and others
Blocker v. White et al
as 1:2013cv00242
Plaintiff:
Marvin Blocker
Defendant:
Sgt. White, C/O Brown, Warden & More Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brian Braxton, Sr. v. Cole
as 12-7842
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIAN OMAR BRAXTON, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
COLE, Lt. Supervisor of housing unit 5, HARRIS, Sgt. of housing unit 5, THOMAS, Sgt. of housing unit 5 and others
Crawford v. Casteel et al
as 3:2012cv01094
Plaintiff:
Markus Crawford
Defendant:
Teresa Casteel and C/O Browning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matlak v. Damon et al
as 3:2012cv01027
Plaintiff:
Boguslaw Slawomir Matlak
Defendant:
C/O Fleming and C/O Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrd v. Gaetz, et al
as 3:2012cv01018
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Byrd
Defendant:
C/O Fagerland, C/O Brown, Lt. Hubler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrd v. Gaetz et al
as 3:2012cv00832
Plaintiff:
Thomas Byrd
Defendant:
Warden Gaetz, C/O Fagerland, C/O Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Springer v. Brown #1 et al
as 7:2012cv00158
Defendant:
C/O Brown #1, C/O Brown #2, Q.M.H.P. Bullion and others
Plaintiff:
Levi Springer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
