Cases 41 - 50 of 21,366
Obrist v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00603
Plaintiff:
David Obrist
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Davol Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
Rotisha Johnson
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Barr v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00596
Plaintiff:
Angela Barr
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hawley v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00605
Plaintiff:
Beatrice Hawley
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Edwards v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00588
Plaintiff:
Maceo III Edwards
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ellison v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00576
Plaintiff:
Bradly Ellison
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thompson v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00573
Plaintiff:
Sheila Hurt Thompson
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cicero v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
Michael Cicero
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pobanz v. Bard Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
Richard Pobanz
Defendant:
Bard Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DeCoursy v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00494
Plaintiff:
Susana DeCoursy
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
