Cases 1 - 10 of 49
ROGERS v. C. R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv00740
Plaintiff:
KYLE ROGERS
Defendant:
C. R. BARD, INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
MAURICE JOHNSON, ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF THERESA JOHNSON AND GREGORY GOODEN v. C. R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02783
Defendant:
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. and C. R. BARD, INC.
Plaintiff:
MAURICE JOHNSON, ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF THERESA JOHNSON AND GREGORY GOODEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
West v. C. R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01541
Defendant:
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. and C. R. BARD, INC.
Plaintiff:
Lurendia West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McGRAIN v. C. R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv01539
Defendant:
C. R. BARD, INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Plaintiff:
DENISE McGRAIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSTON v. C. R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00043
Defendant:
DOES 1-100 INCLUSIVE, C R BARD INC and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA JOHNSTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSTON v. C. R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv06256
Defendant:
DOES 1-100, INCLUSIVE, C. R. BARD, INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA JOHNSTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schubert v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05359
Defendant:
C R BARD INC, ETHICON INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Schubert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHAFER-ISAAC v. C. R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv05172
Plaintiff:
TINA L. SHAFER-ISAAC
Defendant:
C. R. BARD, INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. C. R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv05169
Defendant:
BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC. and C. R. BARD, INC.
Plaintiff:
PAUL L. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHAFER-ISAAC v. C. R. BARD, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv05173
Plaintiff:
TINA L. SHAFER-ISAAC
Defendant:
C. R. BARD, INC. and BARD PERIPHERAL VASCULAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
