Cases 1 - 10 of 60
TATE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv04518
Plaintiff:
JAMES C TATE and JAMES CALVIN TATE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Jerrinon Tate v. United States
as 22-2016
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jerrinon C. Tate
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Chacon v. OnPoint Roadside Express, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv02556
Plaintiff:
Alexey Chacon
Defendant:
OnPoint Roadside Express, LLC, Gregory C. Tate, OnPoint Roadside Express, LLC an Illinois Corporation doing business as G & B Assistance and others
ARGUETA et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2022cv00657
Plaintiff:
DARWIN O. ARGUETA, KAREN N. ARIKPO, GREGORY S. ARRINGTON and others
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216 Fair Labor Standards Act
Daigle v. Mathew et al
as 1:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Claudia Daigle
Defendant:
Francis J. Mathew, Julie J Vargas, John P Hays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States v. Leroy Tate
as 22-1119
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Leroy C. Tate
Tate v. United Steel
as 21-30763
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James C. Tate
Defendant / Appellee:
United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied International and Service Workers International Union Local 8363, More Properly Identified As
TATE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv18404
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DARRION C TATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. C. George
as 21-1117
Defendant / Appellant:
C. TATE GEORGE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
