Cases 1 - 10 of 20
CAMPBELL v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR C. CAMPBELL
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC., PHILIPS RS NORTH AMERICA LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GANSMAN v. RESOURCE AMERICA, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv03820
Plaintiff:
MARGARET GANSMAN
Defendant:
RESOURCE AMERICA, INC., MICHAEL J. BRADLEY, CARLOS C. CAMPBELL and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
TATUM et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2013cv01814
Plaintiff:
DENISE TATUM, BOBBY E. ABRAMS, JR., STEFON L. ADAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Ball v. Campbell et al
as 1:2011cv02239
Plaintiff:
Dawn Ball
Defendant:
C. Campbell, Hummel, Beckley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMPBELL v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv58748
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR C CAMPBELL
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. UNKNOWN HEIRS OF NOVITA C. CAMPBELL et al
as 3:2011cv00243
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
UNKNOWN HEIRS OF NOVITA C. CAMPBELL and ERIC SHAFER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
CAMPBELL v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv49828
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM C. CAMPBELL
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CAMPBELL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv41524
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. CAMPBELL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CAMPBELL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL
as 2:2011cv45395
Plaintiff:
RICHARD C. CAMPBELL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
CAMPBELL et al v. GAF CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv60367
Plaintiff:
CLAYTON C. CAMPBELL and PAULINE MARIE CAMPBELL
Defendant:
GAF CORPORATION , KEENE CORPORATION , MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
