Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Yates et al v. Chen
as 1:2020cv00247
Plaintiff:
Steven W. Yates and Patricia Yates
Defendant:
Steven C. Chen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chen v. Mitchell
as 19-2355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Victor C. Chen
Defendant / Appellee:
Donald J. Trump, President, USA, Andrea Mitchell, Correspondent, NBC News and Kim Jong-Un, Leader Democratic People's Republic
Elson v. Stumpf, et al.,
as 4:2016cv05817
Plaintiff:
Elson and Robert Elson
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO & COMPAY, Stumpf,, John G. Stumpf and others
Petitioner:
The City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Elson v. Stumpf, et al.,
as 3:2016cv05817
Plaintiff:
Robert Elson
Defendant:
John G. Stumpf, Carrie Tolstedt, John D. Baker, II and others
Movant:
The City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Chen
as 2:2011mc00133
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
John C Chen
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Espuelas et al
as 1:2011cv00025
Plaintiff:
Securities And Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Fernando J. Espuelas, Jack C. Chen, Steven J. Heller and others
Respondent:
Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP
Movant:
KPMG LLP
Securities And Exchange Commission v. Espuelas et al
as 1:2010mi00207
Plaintiff:
Securities And Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Fernando J. Espuelas, Jack C. Chen, Steven J. Heller and others
Respondent:
Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP
Movant:
KPMG LLP
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv06277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Chang, et al v. Bayer Corp, et al
as 1:2004cv04869
Plaintiff:
Y Chang, C - Chen , T-Y Chen and others
Defendant:
Bayer Corporation and Baxter Healthcare Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
