Cases 21 - 30 of 281
DANIELS v. SANTOS et al
as 1:2022cv02364
Plaintiff:
TAMARA C. DANIELS
Defendant:
ROBERT L. SANTOS, MARILYN A. SANDERS, WILLIE ROGERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Brown et al v. Webb
as 1:2022cv06493
Plaintiff:
Paula Brown and Dasir C. Daniels
Defendant:
Ernest Webb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Daniels v. Santos
as 1:2022cv04027
Plaintiff:
Tamara C Daniels
Defendant:
Robert L Santos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Cook v. Daniels et al
as 4:2022cv00577
Plaintiff:
Joe H Cook, III
Defendant:
C Daniels and F Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DANIELS v. CULPEPPER et al
as 5:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
DARRYL C DANIELS
Defendant:
Z CULPEPPER, JANE DOE I and MELVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clervrain et al v. Fetterman et al
as 3:2022cv00507
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Alex Felix, Lormil Woodny and others
Defendant:
John Fetterman, Elena Cross, Will Danowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DANIELS v. TAYLOR et al
as 5:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
DARRYL C DANIELS
Defendant:
CHANDA TAYLOR and FNU R TAYLOR, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaines v. Warden Hutchings et al
as 2:2021cv02215
Plaintiff:
John Gaines and Kenya Gaines
Defendant:
Warden Hutchings, S. Butler, c/o Mesa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willie Smith v. Aaron Ford, et al
as 21-16907
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIE T. SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
AARON FORD, JAMES DZURENDA, C. DANIELS and others
Green Mountain Holdings (Cayman) Ltd. v. Cindy Sonds et al
as 2:2021cv05315
Defendant:
Cindy Sonds, Cindy Riddick, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Green Mountain Holdings (Cayman) Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
