Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Charles LondonIn re: Charles London
as 22-30090
Petitioner: In re: Charles C. London
Warrenton London, Sr. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
as 22-1077
Petitioner / Appellant: WARRENTON S. LONDON, SR. and CARLENE C. LONDON
Respondent / Appellee: COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
London v. USA
as 3:2021cv00583
Petitioner: Charles C. London
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Carlene London, et al v. Cmsnr. IRS
as 21-1174
Petitioner / Appellant: Warrenton S. London and Carlene C. London
Respondent / Appellee: Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Evans v. Hall et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv00066
Defendant: Deputy Warden George Castrol, Pelicia Hall, Deputy Warden Gabriel Walker and others
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Plaintiff: Dante Joseph Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Hall et al
as 5:2020cv00058
Defendant: A. Pullum, C. London, S. Williams and others
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Plaintiff: Dante Joseph Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
London v. USA
as 3:2017cv00498
Petitioner: Charles C. London
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
USA v. Charles London We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-31022
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: CHARLES C. LONDON, also known as "C"
Hua v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv05261
Petitioner: Jiang Yan Hua
212) 566-7501 (fax: Joyce C London
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
London v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv50548
Defendant: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co KG , Boehringer Ingelheim International GMBH and others
Plaintiff: Joseph C. London
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?