Cases 1 - 10 of 82
Romero v. Forlenza et al
as 1:2024cv10864
Defendant:
John B Forlenza, Lake County Sheriff's Office and Lake County, Illinois
Plaintiff:
Jaime C Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LI v. JADDOU et al
as 2:2024cv04749
Plaintiff:
SHUI MING LI
Defendant:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, UR M. JADDOU and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
DONG v. JADDOU et al
as 2:2024cv04489
Plaintiff:
XIUFENG DONG
Defendant:
Secretary ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, U.S. Attorney JACQUELINE C ROMERO, Director UR M. JADDOU and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04216
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1255 Failure USCIS To Adjudicate Permanent Residency Petition
NELLOM v. PANCKERI et al
as 2:2024cv03045
Defendant:
TIFFANY BOWMAN, DAVID E. SOMERS, III, DELORES MONTGOMERY and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK NELLOM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01713
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01712
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
DONG v. JADDOU et al
as 5:2024cv01642
Plaintiff:
SHENG FENG DONG
Defendant:
Director UR M. JADDOU, Director KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
HUANG v. JADDOU et al
as 2:2024cv01418
Plaintiff:
GUI HUA HUANG
Defendant:
UR M. JADDOU, KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
