Cases 1 - 10 of 129
(PC) Luu v. Warden - Wasco State Prison, et al.
as 1:2025cv00354
Plaintiff:
Quoc Xuong Luu
Defendant:
Warden - Wasco State Prison and C.D.C.R.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Navarro et al
as 3:2024cv02161
Defendant:
N. Garsilaso, Terrence F. Sheehy, F. Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Lance Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Jones v. C.D.C.R. et al
as 1:2024cv01298
Defendant:
C.D.C.R., Boney and Wasco State Prison - Warden/Superintendent
Plaintiff:
Eugene Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrade
as 4:2024cv07434
Defendant:
C.D.C.R
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Rodriguez Andrade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. California Criminal Justice System et al
as 3:2024cv01981
Defendant:
CDCR Office of Grievance, Jensen, Salono and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Elijah Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Macomber, et al.
as 24-5635
Respondent:
JEFF MACOMBER, Secretary of C.D.C.R. and LEANNA LUNDY, Warden pf CSP-LAC
Petitioner:
JOE ALFRED TAYLOR, III
Avalos v. Dr. Ashby et al
as 4:2024cv05581
Defendant:
Dr. Ashby, Government Claim Office (Sacramento, CA.), C.D.C.R. and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Avalos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Blanton v. D.O.J, et al.
as 2:2023cv02987
Plaintiff:
Derrik Michael Blanton
Defendant:
D.O.J, C.D.C.R and N.S.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Blanton v. D.O.J, et al.
as 1:2023cv01747
Plaintiff:
Derrik Michael Blanton
Defendant:
D.O.J, C.D.C.R and N.S.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lorenzini v. Ragasa et al
as 1:2023cv05904
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Joseph Lorenzini
Defendant:
Ragasa and C.D.C.R. Correctional Training Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
