Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Maher Suarez v. Jeff Macomber, et al
as 23-15821
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAHER CONRAD SUAREZ
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF MACOMBER, Warden, in his capacity as Secretary, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation; and CONNIE GIPSON, Warden, in her capacity as Director, Division of Adult Institutions, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Defendant:
JEFFREY BEARD, MICHAEL STAINER, KELLY HARRINGTON, Warden and others
(PC) Ashker v. Beard et al
as 1:2021cv01611
Plaintiff:
Todd Ashker
Defendant:
Jeffrey Beard, Scott Kernan, George Giurbino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. I.S.U. et al
as 4:2021cv04368
Defendant:
AW, CPT Parry, CCII Sheldon and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rico v. Bristow et al
as 3:2019cv05892
Defendant:
C.E. Ducart, D. Bradburry, M. Voong and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge A. Rico
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCraw v. Ducart et al
as 3:2019cv01122
Defendant:
Jewish Chaplain, C.E. Ducart, J. Kreindler and others
Plaintiff:
Travion A McCraw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cowie v. Robertson et al
as 5:2019cv00145
Defendant:
Jim Robertson, K. Royal, T. S. Buchanan and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel A. Cowie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Solorio v. Ducart et al
as 4:2018cv07708
Defendant:
R. Wilson, C.E. Ducart, D. Jacobsen and others
Plaintiff:
Adrian Solorio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Ducart
as 4:2018cv05141
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Crawford
Defendant:
C.E. Ducart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Montgomery et al
as 3:2018cv01835
Defendant:
M. Polland, J.V. Garcia, C.E. Ducart and others
Plaintiff:
Albert Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Verduzco v. Ducart
as 4:2018cv04596
Plaintiff:
Daniel Verduzco
Defendant:
C.E. Ducart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.